Research and Insights
Benchmarking
Compare programmes, portfolios and ecosystems against structured criteria.
Definition
What this capability covers
Benchmarking work that defines comparable criteria and applies them consistently across programmes, portfolios, events or ecosystems.
Included
Typical components
The exact scope depends on the operating question, the available data and the intended audience for the output.
- Benchmarking criteria design
- Comparable data collection
- Programme and portfolio benchmarking
- Ecosystem benchmarking
- Interpretation and recommendations
Method
Structured research connected to operational reality
Research outputs are strongest when they combine defined criteria, reliable data sources, contextual analysis and clear boundaries around what can be claimed.
01
Define the decision or reporting question
02
Structure available data and evidence
03
Analyse patterns, gaps and implications
Continue
Other research areas
Ecosystem research
Structured research into ecosystem structure, participants, activity, programmes and development, prepared for organisations that fund, operate or participate in an ecosystem.
View area
Market mapping
Market and sector mapping that organises companies, technologies and segments into a structured view for scouting, investment analysis and strategy work.
View area
Impact analysis
Analysis of programme, event and portfolio outcomes using operational data, structured follow-up information and human interpretation.
View area
Discuss benchmarking
We can scope the research question, required inputs and expected output before any work begins.